Overall Question About Us Interviews, Facts, etc. Help Save Democracy Home
Search TrueVoteMD

 

 

 

 
 

E-Voting Plaintiffs Appeal to MD's Highest Court

National Organizations Weigh In

August 9, 2004. Lawyers from Kirkland & Ellis LLP who represent eight plaintiffs in Linda Schade vs. Linda Lamone and the Maryland State Board of Elections filed petitions with the Maryland Court of Appeals today seeking to force the Elections Board to either fix or decertify the controversial Diebold electronic voting systems as required by Maryland state law.

California, Ohio, and other states have taken similar action recently, largely in response to a series of Maryland-commissioned expert reports that exposed widespread security and reliability problems with the nascent technology.

Ryan Phair, lead attorney from Kirkland & Ellis, said, "The petitions filed today present the Maryland Court of Appeals with perhaps the last and only opportunity to avert the possibility of an electoral train wreck before it actually occurs." Phair added that "the State's position -- that Maryland needs to move forward with an illegal election because it is too late to have a legal one -- is simply indefensible."

Linda Schade, plaintiff and Director of TrueVoteMD.org stated, "Across party lines, Maryland voters are demanding a paper trail for this November. It is evident that this case will ultimately be decided by the Maryland Court of Appeals. My hope is that it can be resolved quickly because the election is rapidly approaching and voters are asking -- pleading -- for protection at the polls."

More than a half-dozen national public interest groups, including Electronic Frontier Foundation, Common Cause, American Families United, Verified Voting and many others, have filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs’ petitions, indicating the significance of this landmark case in the growing national turmoil over electronic touch screen voting systems.

Cindy Cohn of Electronic Frontier Foundation, a national legal expert on e-voting, commented, "Maryland can set an example for the entire nation by showing that it has heard the voters, and wants to respond quickly to their demands for a secure and accurate election in November."

The Maryland case is scheduled for a court-ordered mediation on Tuesday, Aug. 10, with Judge Thieme in the Anne Arundel County Circuit Court.

The TrueVoteMD press release is available.

Download the text of the petition for writ of certiorari. (PDF 260K)

Download the appendix to the petition for writ of certiorari. (PDF 1.2MB)

Download the writ of mandamus. (PDF 5.73MB)

 
Please Help TrueVoteMD Protect your Vote

Take Action Today to Make Sure Your Vote Counts!

1. Find Your State Legislators
2. Send a Letter to the House Ways & Means Committee
3. Send a Letter to the Senate Education, Health & Environmental Affairs Committee
4. Tell Others
5. Send a Letter to the Editor
6. Support Federal Election Law Reform
7. Add a banner to your website
 

Breaking News

• Sept. 23, 2004 'A Massive Experiment' in Voting in The Washington Post
• Sept. 20, 2004 The Magic Voting Touch, an Editorial in The Washington Post
• Aug. 27, 2004 After Your Vote Vanishes, an Editorial in The Washington Post
• Aug. 26, 2004 Voting machine safeguards in question in The Baltimore Sun
• Aug. 25, 2004 Md. Machines Seek Vote of Confidence in The Washington Post
How They Could Steal The Election This Time: The Nation Magazine's exhaustive examination of the potential problems with DRE voting systems, including Diebold in Maryland
The Washington Post on TrueVote MD!
Blackwell Halts Deployment of Diebold Voting Machines for 2004
Gov. Ehrlich appoints new member to election board
E-voting regulators often join other side when leaving office
Women Voters Drop Paperless Vote Support
The Disability Lobby and Voting New York Times editorial
•Scans of the Hack the Vote article from the April issue of Vanity Fair magazine.
•Think You Voted in Maryland? Think Again
Takoma Park supports legislation to require modifications to new voting machines purchased by the State of Maryland to create a verifiable paper trail
Diebold "basically had no interest in putting actual security in this system," said Paul Franceus, one of the consultants. "It's not like they did it wrong. It's like they didn't bother."
MD Senate report finds security risks, recommends paper
Diebold gives paper trail for FREE to San Diego County!!

More news.

 

© 2003 Campaign for Fresh Air and Clean Politics. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy
Designed by Grand Junction Design.